MEMO REPORT (w/recommendation)
EXAMPLE

 
Date:     October 29, 2007
To:         Johna Haefner
From:     David Belany
Subject: IBM PROFS Inconsistencies at the SID Sites

I am writing to discuss my findings on a recent study I conducted concerning inconsistencies in the IBM Systems Integration Division's PROFS (Professional Office System), the electronic mail system used throughout IBM.  The purpose of this memo is to illustrate the inconsistencies of each site and to make recommendations for the migration to a common system.

Functions

PROFS has many capabilities.  Currently, 160 different functions have been created by the PROFS developers.  Each function can be called by using a function key if one is available on a menu, or by the function name on the command line.  As you can see in Table I, some sites have a much more developed and useful system than others.

TABLE I.

  PROFS Functions and Menu Usage

IBM SID SITE

FUNCTIONS

   MAIN MENUS
  AVAILABLE UNIQUE    SPACE USED
  # % # % # %
Boulder 76 47.5 13 17.3 12 50.0
Gaithersburg 118 73.8 40 53.3 19 79.2
Houston 55 34.4 4 5.3 15 62.5
Manassas 46 28.8 1 1.3 20 83.3
Oswego 93 58.1 17 22.7 20 83.3


The Gaithersburg system has a total of 118 functions available, utilizing 73.8% of the 160 commands known to exist.  In contrast, Manassas has only 46 commands, just 28.8% of the total available.  The average number of commands for these five sites is 78—half what it could be.

Within the 160 total functions, there are 75 unique to just one site.  In some cases, this is because tools needed at one site may not be needed at another.  Gaithersburg again leads in this area with 40 functions unique to its system.  This represents 53.3% of the total.  Manassas has only one, and Houston has just four.

Menus

Menu usage also varies at each site.  The PROFS system includes three menus, and each has eight different spaces that can be used for a command.  This means that there is space for 24 functions on the menus.  Manassas and Oswego uses 20 of the 24 spaces, or 83.3%.  Boulder only utilizes 50.0% of the space available.

Recommendation

My recommendations would be to implement a PROFS system similar to the one currently used at Gaithersburg since it is the most developed.  Also, commands that would be useful to all sites, but are currently unique to one or two sites, should be shared between systems.  Menu space should also be utilized to its capacity since it is easier to select a command by using a function key, rather than typing in the whole name.
 

from Technical Report Writing Today, Eighth Edition
Daniel G. Riordan and Steven E. Pauley,
Houghton-Mifflin College Division